Library Design Showcase
Hold Still Pulled after “Big Misunderstanding”
The Blue Springs (Mo.) School District has removed Nina LaCour’s young adult novel Hold Still from its library and classrooms in response to parental complaints about its language and sex scenes.
Kansas City television station KCTV reported November 8 that Stephen and Christina Brown complained to the principal at the Blue Springs Freshman Center after their 14-year-old daughter read the book, which is about a young girl coping with the suicide of her best friend, as part of an extra credit assignment in a freshman English class.
Christina Brown, the student’s mother, said the book is riddled with “F-yous” and called it “extremely inappropriate” for public school because it describes explicit sexual relationships. KCTV said the couple asked for the book to be banned from district reading lists.
When KCTV contacted officials about the Browns’ concerns, the district said in an email that Hold Still “has been removed from the library and classrooms” pending a review by a group of teachers and instructional staff members.
However, the Browns told the Blue Springs Examiner that they didn’t want the book removed from the library, but simply sought an alternative choice for their daughter to read for extra credit. “All we wanted was for our daughter to be able to pick another book,” said Stephen Brown. “Going out on this crusade to ban books was not and is not our agenda.”
As the controversy broke, the Missouri Association of School Librarians released a statement supporting the availability of the book. “Hold Still is a very well-written story of a young adult finding hope during trying circumstances. The teen years are often a challenging time for many young adults,” said Ellen Wickham, MASL Executive Committee member and librarian of the neighboring Raytown School District. “The story offers perspective and inspiration on dealing with difficult situations, and is written honestly and with great concern for how it will impact its target audience of students in grades 9 through 12.”
Hold Still was part of a 15-book reading list given to the class, the Examiner reported November 11. Students were required to pick one book in order to get a grade; those who read three would receive an award. Stephen Brown said none of the other books on the list suited his daughter better.
The student’s father also said that, contrary to the KCTV report, he and his wife never asked that the book be removed or banned. “A student should be able to pick another book to read for a grade,” he said. “We feel like when it comes to school, they should be more toward the middle and not push an agenda either way. It is a partnership between parents and the school. Together we need to guide children and keep up on what is going on. I am all for freedom of speech except for when my rights as a parent are being stepped on. I felt because the teacher was not giving us another option, my rights as a parent were not being considered.”
“It turned out to be a big misunderstanding,” Leslie Evans, the district’s public information director, told the Examiner, explaining that the school district “did not ask for the book to be pulled” even though it ultimately was. “What happened is that the teacher put out her own list and did not use the approved-book reading list. The district-approved reading list has safeguards included and gives parents and students alternatives if they do not like the options on the list.” Evans added, “If every book was pulled from the shelves with questionable themes, we could pull books that have been in the library since I was a kid. We did not want to do that.”
Despite the avowed misunderstanding, Evans told American Libraries that the book remained under review as of November 29.
In early November the Browns met with the school principal and other administrators to discuss their concerns. Stephen Brown told the Examiner the couple was given the district-approved reading list and his daughter was switched to a different English class, adding that he could not be happier with the outcome. “As a parent, I do everything I can to try to keep my child from things that can hurt them. That was all this was about. There was no conspiracy to go after books.”
However, the KCTV report said that before the agreement was reached, the Browns consulted their pastor, Hylton Lawrence, at Lighthouse Independent Baptist Church in Independence. Together, they reviewed the 15 books on the extra credit reading list and told the television station at least nine were inappropriate and should be pulled.
“I’m not for banning—going to the library and saying, ‘Let’s ban every book there,’” Lawrence said. “I’m saying we need to have oversight. These are young people, they are not adults. They are children, and so we need some oversight,”
“Are you aware of the vulgarity? Are you aware of the acts of sex, incest, and homosexuality? All of these. Are you aware of these?” asked Lawrence, adding that he believes it is “my job to be a watchdog” and help determine what are appropriate and inappropriate books.
Trending Now
Current Issue
American Libraries Magazine | 50 East Huron | Chicago, IL 60611 | 2013© American Library Association | Staff Login










Comments
Freshman Center
I am a student of the Blue Springs Freshman Center and I am frankly stunned by the book banning. These parents obviously are not in touch with reality. If the parents want their daughter to be in a “moral” environment then they should homeschool her. Just stand in our halls for five minutes, you’ll understand.
Hold Still- Wait a Minute
That is funny! And a perfect example of what is wrong in today’s society when a parent needs to spend their time reviewing school required reading lists because teachers and administrators cannot discern what is a basic decency.
Two wrongs do not make one right. If your school is a ‘hotbed’ of indecencies, is that the indecency of the student body or of the administration? Do we add more fuel to the fire by the school administration promoting this type of book? Is the administration sending a “double-standard” message by promoting this book? There are dress-codes, forbiddance of public displays of affections, disciplinary action for bad language and everything else under the sun. If you are a 14 or 15 yr. old “adolescent” then this book is not appropriate for promotion to read within a school. It is on a list for “young adults”- an adult is classified as 18 years or older and young “would lead” me to believe that it is referring to 18-19 yr old “young adult”. My son couldn’t walk into a theater to watch this movie (referring to the vulgarities and explicit sexual content). It should not be on a list of required reading. If you cannot stand up in front of the classroom and talk freely about the content- it should not belong on a list of required reading.
I’m in the process of having this book removed from the school library AND it has already been taken off the school’s list of books to read. You can go buy it at Barnes and Nobles or Books A Million, but taxpayers money AND schools should not be promoting this kind of book.
If you reread the article, the difference between what they are saying and what you are saying is that they would like to continue to have the school provide “basic decencies” for their child in what is required reading. What you are saying is that the book talks (literally) about real life and because you feel that your school is somehow “immoral” that that somehow makes it is okay. What you will find is that the power is in the people and until you yourself pay taxes and are an “adult” you really do not have a say in what is in the library to read because parents will continue to have books “pulled” to attempt to provide a safe educational environment for their child. Simply because we can- because ultimately we pay for those books…
I do agree for the most part
I haven’t been out of high school for very long, less than 10 years, and I remember what it was like. While I do agree that their discretion as parents must be considered, I think they’re doing their daughter a disservice by trying to shelter her from the realities of her world. They’re acting like these are things that kids will only experience once they enter the ‘adult’ world, but that is not the case. These are things they are experiencing here and now, which is why these things are being addressed in YA novels. They’re doing their daughter a major disservice in my opinion. My mother reviewed, but did not censor the things that came across my eyes when I was younger and I grew up with a completely realistic view of the world around me and exactly what to and NOT to do to avoid falling into the wrong things. I don’t drink, I don’t smoke, I’ve never done drugs, I’d likely be considered a prude by many, but that’s what the way my mother raised me produced. I have a realistic view of the negative aspects of our world and have made an informed decision about how I want them to relate to my life. How can someone do that if they’re never exposed?
And who is is that gives this
And who is is that gives this Baptist preacher the right to “oversight” of what all public school children in his town are allowed to read? Who is it that gives these parents the right to tell other parents what their children should not be allowed to read? And what world do these people think they live in in which 14 year olds are somehow “protected from harm” by seeing that the adults around them deny the existence of sex and profanity?
Better to read it first in a book
I understand parents wanting to shield their children from topics they might not be ready for, however, I’d always rather that child or teen read about something first than experience it for themselves. The reality of the world is that terrible things happen every day. A well written book that deals honestly with a difficult topic can be a great way to introduce a dialogue between kids and adults. Helping them understand the issues and how kids may want to respond to such a topic is important. Pulling books from shelves, deciding they are inappropriate is not useful. I’d rather kids *read* about topics like incest, sex or drugs. That way I can talk to them and let them know what is right and wrong first. Then, if they ever encounter these things in real life, they are better equipped to deal with these issues: they are prepared. Lawrence acting as a watchdog helps no one.
Interesting article…and I second the other comment—what was on that list????
Out of a list of 15 books the
Out of a list of 15 books the girl and her parents couldn’t find ONE that they would consider appropriate? !9 were inappropriate? What is on this list - is that available?
Gateway Nominees
The list is called the Gateway Nominee List. The assignment was optional to all students of the Freshman Center. You only get credit or prizes or whatever if you read ALL 15 Gateway Nominees. I know the list can be found somewhere.
The reporting in the Examiner
The reporting in the Examiner article got many facts wrong. Hold Still was assigned because it is on the Gateway list, the Missouri State Book List chosen by a committee of librarians, then given to teen reader selectors, and then narrowed down to 15 to be read and voted on throughout the year. The teacher did not create the list, the Gateway Committee, on which I served, did. You can find this year’s list here: http://www.maslonline.org/?GW1112FinalNominees
Students who read three books are eligible to vote, they are not required to read all the books on the list to vote. The book then wins an award, not the student for reading one.