ALA Goes to New York, Things Don’t Get Violent



Printer-friendly versionPrint

This week, ALA leadership met with senior management from Penguin, Macmillan, Random House, Simon & Schuster, and Perseus publishing houses to discuss ebooks and libraries. ALA went in with a strong mission statement from ALA Executive Director Keith Michael Fiels: “Dialog begins with saying you need to deal with libraries and you need to do it as soon as possible.” But for some, this declaration might have been a bit strong.

The Annoyed Librarian seems to have been a bit annoyed by ALA’s use of assertive language. “There’s some tough talk from the ALA Executive Director… . I’ve attended a lot of meetings in my time and I’ve never seen one that began so belligerently accomplish anything.” Despite the Annoyed Librarian’s characterization of Fiels’s statement as a godfather-esque threat, assertiveness is what many librarians want from their organization.

In March of last year, Librarian in Black Sarah Houghton took ALA to task for being too timid with HarperCollins. “Speak out and speak out now, ALA. Reassert libraries’ rights to lend materials. Reassert libraries’ responsibilities to the public good. And reassert libraries’ roles in our communities as cultural and thought leaders… . Please, say something to the world—or the rest of us will keep talking loudly, angrily, and unofficially.”

Assertiveness seems to have worked out well. I assume that the lack of reporting on broken legs, horses’ heads, or other violent acts during the ALA/publisher meetings means that Annoyed Librarian’s perception of ALA heading to New York “talking like gangsters from The Godfather” might have been a bit dramatic. Instead, the meetings are being characterized as upbeat, productive, and substantive. An immediate outcome from ALA’s work is an announcement from Random House on a new model for ebook lending with a higher upfront price, but no additional restrictions on loans.

As Dennis Johnson, copublisher at Melville House, wrote of the meetings: “It’s one of those modern situations that no one in publishing ever imagined: Being at odds with librarians, the ultimate champions of literacy and literature. But that’s been the situation as publishers have tried to figure out how, exactly, to handle selling ebooks to libraries.” But, Johnson noted, the announcement from Random House shows progress is being made thanks to these meetings. “Thus is history made. Now we wait and see how long it takes the remaining Big Five to follow suit.”

For a more detailed report from ALA President Molly Raphael on ALA’s meetings with publishers, check back to the E-Content blog next week.

Comments

violent?

I find this snarky, misleading headline offensive and irresponsible. Is it funny because librarians are passive and meek? Or that we’re crazy spinsters who can go off the rocker? Or we don’t have passion about our work?

In a world that is increasing violent, libraries and librarians are still considered safe and supportive. Let’s continue to support our reputation.

The title is a snarky take on

The title is a snarky take on the hypocrasy of other posts that tried to make a big deal about ALA going to New York like gangsters after Fiels’ comments. It’s funny because librarians are not meek or mild (or violent) by nature. But after much protestation about ALA not being strong enough on ebook issues, the more assertive approach was met with over the top rhetoric from some anonymous bloggers.

I carefully selected the word assertive as focus of my post. Assertiveness - confident declarations of expertise supported by experience and data - are what I feel we need. Librarians have a strong tradition of assertiveness in the face of censorship, privacy, and other issues. Just ask the FBI about those assertive “radical, militant librarians” they ran up against!

So please, be assured that I too am very happy that violent crime in this country continues to decline. I too am concerned about ongoing conflicts that plague our world. I actively support a number of national and international peace and social justice organizations and projects. But I also have a bad habit of using snark or flippancy to push a point. Sorry if it offended you, humor was the intention.

Chris

  I don't generally

I don’t generally respond to people who aren’t willing to take personal responsibility for their actions (that is to say anonymous postings and bloggers) but, I will in this case.

I agree wholeheartedly with your statement that “In a world that is increasing violent, libraries and librarians are still considered safe and supportive. Let’s continue to support our reputation.”

As one of the kindest and most gentle of souls (you can check on that), that is exactly why I was distressed to be accused by Library Journal of being belligerent and a “gangster” because I am willing to speak up for libraries. It's true, I can become a bit worked up when someone tries to cut library budgets or eliminate librarians or refuses to sell ebooks to libraries. I am passionate about libraries, that I will admit.

We need to take a strong stand here. Public, academic and school librarians serve many, many millions of people who have no other access to information and reading materials. These people should not be denied access to ebooks by libraries - or by publishers. That’s just wrong.