Library Design Showcase
E-Learning: The Product of a Risk Is a Lesson - Page 5
Online learning for library staff is taking shape and taking off
Posted Tue, 02/15/2011 - 10:10
“In all of our webinars, we invite librarians to participate as cofacilitators in the event, sharing the experiences, rather than a sage-on-stage approach,” TechSoup Strategic Communications Manager Sarah Washburn explained. “You’ll never sit in a MaintainIT webinar where just one person is lecturing. We use ReadyTalk, and we wanted to give folks as much opportunity as possible to engage with the participants. This meant taking risks and allowing all functions of ReadyTalk to be open to everyone. With risks, there are challenges: We’ve experienced a couple of moments where participants didn’t fully understand the power they had, and accidentally selected functions that hindered the experience for others, but those were more rare than common.”
Those hindrances can range from participants advancing or backing up PowerPoint slides while presenters are speaking to accidentally closing down the entire visual feed during a live presentation, leaving everyone only with audio. The result was an edgy and engaging learning experience for everyone, and the presenters modeled first-rate training techniques through their ability to work with whatever surprises participants provide.
“At first, we were a bit unnerved,” Washburn admitted, “and would always ask: Is it worth it to allow such power? And always, we’d come back to the answer: Yes. We’d learn from our mistakes and try to be more clear, and also more poised, about dealing with the implications when the worst case scenario surfaced. Sometimes this approach means taking risks, but the product of a risk is a lesson.”
With all that online learners face in live formats such as webcasts and webinars, they may sometimes be overwhelmed the first time they join a session. When all tools are in place, the learner may be watching PowerPoint slides; hearing the audio feed from the presenter; joining the conversation through the use of a headset or speakers and microphone or by dial-in telephone access; using drawing tools to interact with what is visible on the computer monitor; jumping from the slides to another website via live links; and following and participating in the typed chat, which sometimes proceeds at a dizzying pace down one side of the monitor screen.
Experienced users find the experience helpful and exhilarating. “Running chat is one of my favorite tools,” Gutsche said. “It’s like being encouraged to pass notes in class—these are notes that everyone gets to read and, therefore, everyone benefits. It’s done without interrupting the flow of instruction. It gets people involved more continually.”
The various forms of input can be daunting even for experienced presenters, so many have at least one assistant next to them during live sessions. “If you are doing a synch [synchronous] class, you must have a producer. Big time,” Coleman insists.
Measuring e-learning outcomes
Assessment and evaluation was of interest to several of those interviewed, but few were actively engaged in anything beyond the most elementary of efforts.
One potential evaluation model for libraries is the Friday5s technique developed and used by Fort Hill Company, which uses online follow-up to training sessions. Fort Hill has managers and employees meet before training occurs so that they can discuss goals and objectives; has the learners participate in a learning event; and engages them in the Friday5s program, which encourages contact between learners and their managers for up to three months through online exercises designed to take five minutes or less to complete every Friday. Learners use drop-down windows and text boxes to document how they have applied what they learned and to set achievable goals for the following week, and managers see these brief reports as soon as the learners complete them.
The process “increases transfer and application effort, interaction with managers, improvement by participants, and return on investment in the program,” wrote Calhoun Wick, Roy Pollock, Andrew Jefferson, and Richard Flanagan in The Six Disciplines of Breakthrough Learning: How to Turn Training and Development into Business Results. It also made managers “significantly more aware of their direct reports’ learning transfer objectives” than was documented in a control group, they reported.
“We know without a post-program support process (like Friday5s) only 15% of people follow through in a way that changes behavior,” Michael Papay, vice president of business development for Fort Hill, confirmed during a live chat. “That means there is an 85% waste following learning events without a follow-through process.”
Even without an automated follow-up system, library leaders can engage in follow-up exercises with learners. The staff of Georgia’s multicounty Uncle Remus Regional Library System, for example, have two months to complete e-learning courses they are taking and then bring their certificate of completion with them to the manager’s meeting, and a discussion of the topic is part of the agenda.
Trending Now
Current Issue
American Libraries Magazine | 50 East Huron | Chicago, IL 60611 | 2013© American Library Association | Staff Login









Comments
E-Learning: The Product of a Risk Is a Lesson
When we think about e-learning, we often mimic our overall approach to technology: We either allow it to inspire us with a sense of awe or we are overwhelmed by it. It is possible to lose sight of the fact that technology is a tool, a means to an end, and not the controlling factor that determines our goals and objectives. Workplace learning and performance need to lead to positive change that benefits organizations—libraries—and the people they serve in measurable ways.
Kuhlmann's Rapid E-Learning and the E-Learning Summit
Thanks, Dawn and Gene, for the additional first-rate resources and the kind words. I’m a big fan of Kuhlmann’s, and events like the E-Learning Summit give all of us a tremendous boost as well as much needed encouragement. The eLearning Guild’s online “Learning Solutions Magazine” is yet another fabulous free resource for anyone wanting to take a deep dive into the subject, and the latest postings include an interview with Kuhlmann (posted February 17, 2011) at http://www.learningsolutionsmag.com/. Hope we keep this conversation going here in ways that benefit all of us and those we serve.
Exposure to Elearning
Great article! I completely agree that people and businesses tend to look at elearning as jsut some sort of wind up toy that you crank and put into motion and then watch it work. That is NOT the case. This article captures it, and the successful platfroms and entities that use elearning platforms have excellent follow through, dedicated instructors, and a well planned courseload (as mentioned in this article). Too many times we get caught up in watching a program or a learning platform perform, rather than get involved in the actual learning. A more hands on approach is needed. A good way to familiraize staff and insturctors with this hands on approach is exposing them to an <a href=”http://www.theelsummit.com/ereg887412.cfm?pg=agenda”>e learning</a> conference, such as the E-Learning Summit (see link for scheduled speakers) in Washington D.C. I missed the last conference (in January), but think that I will attend this particular one for the exposure to new and exciting elarning platforms.
Rapid E-Learning
Libraries need to learn to embrace more Rapid E-Learning technologies since most don’t have dedicated staff to create courses. I’ve learned more in the videos from Tom Kuhlmann and his Rapid E-Learning blog than I have from any library-related webinars or other training forums: http://www.articulate.com/rapid-elearning/His course templates are gold and are always teaching me new ways of looking at how people learn, getting away from bullet points, looking at non-linear learning (which I think most librarians have a very hard time with). Just his manipulation of Powerpoint alone can majorly overhaul any asynchronous exchange of information, be it in an academic or public library setting.You don’t need to purchase Articulate’s suite of tools to do Rapid Elearning. His concepts are great if you’re doing screen narration using free tools like Jing or even creating audio narrated Powerpoints. Libraries could use more of these elements - short narrations or videos that explain all we have to offer and give brief tips on getting the most out of the tools we have to offer. The benefits in marketing alone using some of his concepts could really put the library in a new light for users!
OPAL
For exactly the reasons you cited in much of your post, I didn’t draw OPAL into that article. Wanted, instead, to concentrate on what seems most effective at this point, and am grateful that you added to the conversation here with the additional information. Will be equally grateful for resources anyone else cares to mention or add so we all continue learning—and helping other learners learn.
I see no mention of OPAL
I see no mention of OPAL http://www.opal-online.org an online program site for libraries. Tom Peter’s runs it and it has been around for quite a while. Sometimes the technology works, sometimes it doesn’t like this afternoon’s presentation from the Library of Congress. But it has never really taken off although the potential is there. Especially it has not taken off for library patrons. I don’t think libraries have yet figured out how to mesh in-person learning with on-line learning in a hybrid model so you are serving a local learning community with online resources. People learn together, share what they are learning, in a peer-to-peer setting, using e-learning technology as part of the mix like what is happening in the public schools. Public libraries don’t always have the right personnel and community mix to make it happen. Need vision, possibilities and leadership. But most of all you have to have a community of library users that say, “Yeah! We want that!”
Post new comment