Google Settlement Opponents Ask Congress for Nonprofit Alternative


At you library logo

I love libraries ad

ALA Store ad

Advertise on our site


Printer-friendly versionPrint

By Gordon Flagg

A month before the February 18 final fairness hearing for the proposed settlement of lawsuits challenging Google’s Book Search project, the Open Book Alliance called on Congress to instead help establish a digital book database operated by a neutral, nonprofit organization.

In a January 19 letter sent to members of Congress and digitization advocates, OBA cofounder Peter Brantley called for Google “to halt its current strategy, which focuses on fattening its profits and ensuring its continued domination of the Internet search market at the expense of broader social responsibilities.” Instead, he asked the parties to the proposed settlement to join a “new inclusive process” to develop a comprehensive digital public library that would “foster competitive instead of exclusive markets” and promote “long-term benefits for consumers … over isolated commercial interests.” Brantley asked that OBA’s proposed alternative “be done in a way that respects authors’ rights and copyright.”

The letter (PDF file) went on to say that such a library must result from “an open and deliberative conversation in Congress“ that  would “appropriately weigh the concerns of all stakeholders [and that it] should be entrusted to a neutral, civic, not-for-profit organization … such as the Library of Congress” and “must not be exclusive to a single for-profit company.”

The OBA is a coalition of opponents of the settlement proposed by Google, the Authors Guild, and the Association of American Publishers. Its members include Google competitors Microsoft, Amazon.com, and Yahoo, as well as the Internet Archive, the National Writers Union, the Special Libraries Association, and the New York Library Association.

American Libraries, Tue, 01/19/2010 - 16:03

Comments

With OBA

 Glad to learn about OBA’s efforts.  Google’s ends justify the means rationale for mass digitization and control of books in libriaries never sat right with me.  

 

 

Library of Congress already not keeping all the books sent

My understanding is that the Library of Congress has already stopped keeping two copies of everybook submitted.  One would hope they at least make a digital copy before discarding the original.  It seems logical to have the Library of Congress be the national archive of book contents rather than Google, because Google could end up belonging to another country besides, or in addition to, the current U.S. owners.  For the sake of national pride and responsibility to our past and future citizens, the archive should belong to the people, all the people. A final thought:  We should not be so hasty to discard the paper copies…paper lasts centuries longer than digital formats.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.