Joanne Budler

Kansas State Librarian Joanne Budler recently terminated the Kansas Digital Library Consortium’s contract with ebook vendor OverDrive to become a beta tester of 3M’s new Cloud Library ebook lending service. The change is the culmination of a nearly yearlong battle over whether the consortium owned the content it had purchased or had simply licensed it. It also required her to undertake a massive campaign: contacting 165 publishers whose ebooks the library had purchased, because OverDrive requires those publishers’ permission to transfer platforms. In this interview, conducted by email with American Libraries Senior Editor Beverly Goldberg, Budler discussed her decision and its ramifications for Kansas.

AMERICAN LIBRARIES: Why did you decide to take this bold stance and make Kansas a precedent?

JOANNE BUDLER: There were really only two issues: pricing and ownership of content.

A pricing increase of 700% is unreasonable, especially in today’s economic climate when library budgets have consistently been cut over the past 3 years. In addition, if the State Library (on behalf of the Consortium) agreed to pay $75,000 for the platform fee, there would be that much less funding for content.

But the bigger issue was the change in paragraph 11.4 which basically changed our ownership of content to a subscription. This tied our access to this content to a continuation of the service with OverDrive. I believed, and Deputy Attorney General Jeffrey Chanay agreed, that content we purchased under the 2005 contract is ours. We should be free to move it to another platform or “shelf,” as long as we maintain the integrity of the Digital Rights Management (DRM) system.

Was this feasible only because of the original contract with OverDrive, which the company has now changed?

Yes, that is correct. Once paragraph 11.4 was changed to the new contract language and that new contract was signed, I believe it would have been more difficult, if not impossible, to claim ownership of that content.

Have all of the publishers that you wrote for permission responded to your request?

No. We sent letters to 165. Approximately 20 publishers have not responded at all.

How are you handling the publishers that required an additional fee to have their titles included in the consortium’s collection?

The state library (on behalf of the consortium) owns this content and will not pay additional fees. The Attorney General’s office will be handling future correspondence regarding this.

What percentage of the OverDrive collection will be available to Kansas libraries on the new 3M platform? At least half?

We actually have two platforms: one for ebooks (3M Cloud Library) and one for audiobooks (Recorded Books: OneClickDigital). At the present time we have written permission to move 73% of the total ebooks and 63% of the downloadable audiobooks to the new platforms.

Are there any gaps in service, as the Topeka and Wichita librarians were worried about?

There was be no gap in service with Recorded Books. That service is available now to all Kansans. There has been a gap in service with downloadable ebooks because our service with OverDrive ceased on December 5, 2011.

The administrative service through 3M has been set up for the staff of the State Library of Kansas and librarians around the state (PDF file). The service itself will be accessible to library users this week, and the PC app will be ready no later than March 31, 2012.

Are there any independent agreements between libraries and vendors/publishers in the works, and how does that affect the consortium’s ability to negotiate on behalf of its members?

Approximately a dozen libraries in Kansas have signed agreements with OverDrive either independently or as a small consortium. This has not affected the state library’s ability to negotiate on behalf of the statewide consortium, which includes all libraries in Kansas.

Have you ever regretted going down this path?

No. It was the right thing to do.

How do you think this will affect publisher/vendor agreements with ebook consortia in other states?

I don’t know that it will. I guess we will have to wait and see.

What advice do you give other consortia in negotiating with ebook vendors and publishers?

I think that the library community and the publishers need to negotiate to a gain-gain solution. Certainly the library community wants publishers to continue to be economically successful. After all, where would we be without publishers? And anecdotally we know that the same library user who borrows from his/her library also purchases books–in all formats. I wish that there were more empirical evidence to support this!

Should ALA set guidelines for ebook lending contracts, and if so, what elements should be included?

Yes, I think that would be very helpful. E-content should not be treated any differently than physical content. It is irresponsible to spend tax dollars on material that evaporates or disappears at the end of a certain period of time, whether that is a subscription period or a contract life.

Ownership should be retained by the purchaser. Transfer from one shelf/platform to another should be based on DRM, i.e. as long as DRM is maintained, it should not matter which shelf/platform holds that content.

Latest Library Links

2h

Joe Árvai writes: “As artificial intelligence (AI) creeps further into people’s daily lives, so do worries about it. At the most alarmist are concerns about AI going rogue and terminating its human masters. But my own research as a psychologist who studies how people make decisions leads me to believe that all these risks are overshadowed by an even more corrupting, though largely invisible, threat. That is, AI is mere keystrokes away from making people even less disciplined and skilled when it comes to thoughtful decisions.”

The Conversation, Apr. 12
6h

Tess Prendergast writes: “As someone who teaches contemporary children’s literature, I have been following the surge of picture books about climate and environment topics for several years. While there has been some great scholarly research about such books, I have devised a simple framework for grouping these kinds of books. This four-tiered categorization may help you decided what to read, suggest, or display in various scenarios and for different audiences.”

ALSC Blog, Apr. 11
1d

Max Eddy writes: “It’s a nightmare scenario: You’ve protected all of your online accounts with two-factor authentication (2FA), but then your phone is broken, lost, or stolen, and you’re locked out of everything. Past You’s effort to protect Future You has made Present You’s life a living hell. 2FA is supposed to keep attackers and scammers out of your online accounts, but what if something happens to your second factor? With a little planning, you can reduce that risk and still keep your accounts safe.”

New York Times Wirecutter, Apr. 12
1d

Nik Altenberg writes: “About 100 librarians and their supporters rallied outside San Francisco Public Library’s Main Library on April 9 to demand the city hire security guards for every branch. Workers decried a lack of security at most of the city’s branches and said they are often forced to de-escalate volatile situations and step into the role of providing security themselves. The rally is the latest in a series of union actions [from 10 unions representing more than 25,000 city workers across city departments] seeking to draw attention to what they say is a pervasive understaffing crisis.”

KQED-TV (San Francisco), Apr. 9
2d

“Two years after Brooklyn Public Libraries’ (BPL) launch of Books Unbanned, an initiative to protect the freedom to read for young people, In Their Own Words: Youth Voices on Books Unbanned gives new insight into the impact of censorship on teen and young adults across the US and how restrictions and other barriers to access build upon and reinforce each other. The new report, published April 11 by BPL and Seattle Public Library, analyzes 855 stories shared by young people who signed up for a free Books Unbanned ecard from April 2022 through December 2023.”

Seattle Public Library, Apr. 11
2d

Samantha Guss, Sojourna Cunningham, and Jennifer Stout write: “Recruitment and retention are both critical to diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts in academic libraries, and failing to improve retention has and will continue to derail these initiatives. Research that addresses retention tends to focus on proposed strategies, such as stay interviews (structured interviews aimed at strengthening employee and employer relationships) and mentorship programs. But there is no agreed-upon definition of retention that would allow us to assess these strategies. We should recognize that involuntary staying can be just as negative an outcome for the individual and the organization as leaving, setting the stage for legacy toxicity.”

In The Library With The Lead Pipe, Apr. 10
3d

Jackie Edwards writes: “As spring rolls around, seasonal allergies can flare up among library workers, resulting in symptoms like sneezing; runny or stuffy nose; itchy eyes, ears, and nose; coughing; and asthma. Not only are these symptoms detrimental to well-being and productivity, but they can also mean you’re less able to provide excellent customer service to library users. Fortunately, by purifying the air, preventing mold, and keeping your work area clean, you can improve indoor air quality and combat allergies in your library.”

Library Worklife, Apr.